Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 31
Filter
1.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 74(Suppl 2): 3220-3222, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2318304

ABSTRACT

Vaccination against SARS CoV-2 has resulted in COVID-19 illness with reduced incidence and milder symptomatology. With the intent to analyze the olfactory and gustatory disturbances in breakthrough COVID-19 illness, we conducted a prospective observational study on a cohort of COVID-19 positive symptomatic otolaryngologist physicians. These doctors being well sensitized to the symptoms and signs of loss of smell and taste, reported even very mild and transient symptoms. This cohort of 25 physicians included 16 unvaccinated and 9 vaccinated otolaryngologists. The overall incidence of smell and taste disturbances reported in this cohort was 80% and 84% respectively. The incidence of olfactory dysfunction was 81% in the unvaccinated group and 78% in the vaccinated group. Similarly, the incidence of gustatory dysfunction was 81% in the unvaccinated group and 89% in the vaccinated group. However, the incidence of complete loss of smell was 54% in the unvaccinated group and 100% in the vaccinated group. Ageusia was noted in 15% of the unvaccinated physicians as compared to 25% of the vaccinated ones. The average duration of smell and taste loss were lesser in the physicians who were vaccinated with two doses than their unvaccinated counterparts. Larger studies are desirable to add further knowledge on the equal incidences and higher degree of loss of smell and taste observed in breakthrough COVID-19 illness as observed in our small prospective cohort study.

2.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 74(Suppl 2): 3180-3185, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2312619

ABSTRACT

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has given rise to unique challenges related to healthcare management. The problems have arisen due to the direct effect of COVID 19 infection and treatment or as repercussions of administrative efforts being undertaken to check the rapid spread of the epidemic. The management of some of the diseases has been hampered with the implementation of the policies like lockdown and transportation difficulties. This paper presents a series of four patients (6 eyes with vision loss) of an otherwise benign entity, Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis (AFRS), causing visual deterioration, managed amid the pandemic. AFRS has been known to cause vision loss by pressure over the optic nerve or its blood supply; however, a timely surgical intervention in the form of functional endoscopic sinus surgery to remove the disease and decompress the optic nerve, results in favourable outcomes in most patients. A delay in diagnosis and treatment may result in irreparable damage with the resulting inability to salvage the vision. In our series, we observed that vision recovery could be achieved in 66.7% of the affected eyes (four out of six eyes), while a poor visual outcome was observed in two (33%). The poor visual outcome was observed for the eyes with a prolonged visual impairment (4-6 months) at the time of presentation. We would appeal to the physicians to be cognizant of the adverse outcomes associated with the delayed surgical intervention of AFRS in the current pandemic scenario.

3.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 2022 Sep 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2249258

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection but infection rates vary. Our objectives are to describe COVID-19 positive HD patients' characteristics, infection rates, and factors associated with mortality in HD COVID-19 cases in Kuwait. METHODS: Data on demographics, comorbidities, and treatments received, as well as mortality for HD patients admitted to hospitals for COVID-19, from 1/March to 31/July 2020, prospectively collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 141 infected HD patients were admitted (Mean age 58 ± 16.1; Males 56%), representing 7% of the total HD population and 0.2% of all COVID-19 cases during the study period. Of those 141 infected HD patients, 27 (19%) died, and this represents 6% of total COVID-19-related mortality and 27% of the total HD mortality. In contrast, total covid-19-related mortality of all positive cases was only 0.7%, and total HD mortality during the study period was only 5%. COVID-19-positive HD patients who died were older and 59% were males. However, the differences were not statistically significant. Of the 61 infected HD patients who needed to be switched to continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), 34% died, and of the 29 infected HD patients who needed admission to intensive care, 65% died. CONCLUSION: HD population represents a small fraction of the total population; however, positive HD COVID-19 cases represent a sizable proportion of COVID-19 cases and a significant percentage of total COVID-19-related mortality, and total HD mortality.

4.
Indian J Urol ; 39(1): 1-2, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2242378
5.
BJU Int ; 2022 Sep 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2239459

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine if management of ureteric stones in the UK changed during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and whether this affected patient outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multicentre retrospective study of adults with computed tomography-confirmed ureteric stone disease at 39 UK hospitals during a pre-pandemic period (23/3/2019-22/6/2019) and a period during the pandemic (the 3-month period after the first severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 case at individual sites). The primary outcome was success of primary treatment modality, defined as no further treatment required for the index ureteric stone. Our study protocol was published prior to data collection. RESULTS: A total of 3735 patients were included (pre-pandemic 1956 patients; pandemic 1779 patients). Stone size was similar between groups (P > 0.05). During the pandemic, patients had lower hospital admission rates (pre-pandemic 54.0% vs pandemic 46.5%, P < 0.001), shorter mean length of stay (4.1 vs 3.3 days, P = 0.02), and higher rates of use of medical expulsive therapy (17.4% vs 25.4%, P < 0.001). In patients who received interventional management (pre-pandemic 787 vs pandemic 685), rates of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (22.7% vs 34.1%, P < 0.001) and nephrostomy were higher (7.1% vs 10.5%, P = 0.03); and rates of ureteroscopy (57.2% vs 47.5%, P < 0.001), stent insertion (68.4% vs 54.6%, P < 0.001), and general anaesthetic (92.2% vs 76.2%, P < 0.001) were lower. There was no difference in success of primary treatment modality between patient cohorts (pre-pandemic 73.8% vs pandemic 76.1%, P = 0.11), nor when patients were stratified by treatment modality or stone size. Rates of operative complications, 30-day mortality, and re-admission and renal function at 6 months did not differ between the data collection periods. CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there were lower admission rates and fewer invasive procedures performed. Despite this, there were no differences in treatment success or outcomes. Our findings indicate that clinicians can safely adopt management strategies developed during the pandemic to treat more patients conservatively and in the community.

6.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 74(Suppl 2): 3043-3049, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2129256

ABSTRACT

The rapid emergence of COVID-19 has led to increase in the number of patients requiring prolonged ventilation and tracheostomy. Though global guidelines are evolving, there is a paucity of literature about optimal timing and outcome after tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. We set out to assess the clinical characteristics and outcome of COVID-19 patients who underwent tracheostomy.This single-center, prospective observational cohort study analyzed all the consecutive tracheostomy performed on COVID-19 patients from April 1 2020 to January 31, 2021. The primary outcome measure was the 30-day mortality rate following tracheostomy and association with various prognostic risk factors. The secondary outcome measures included various tracheostomy-related events, perioperative complications, and decannulation rate.The study included 51 patients with a median age of 52 years and the majority were male (62.74%). 62.74% (32 of 51) tracheostomies were done early (within 10 days of intubation) and the mean duration from endotracheal intubation to tracheostomy was 10.27 days. The 30-day mortality rate was 66.66% (34 of 51) with no tracheostomy-related mortality and the mean duration between tracheostomy and death was 8.29 days. The presence of sepsis was associated with a higher rate of mortality (p = 0.002) while the timing of tracheostomy was not related to increased mortality (p = 0.365). The most common perioperative complication was tracheostoma bleeding (16.64%). At a median follow-up of 7.5 months, only four patients were decannulated.Though associated with a higher rate of 30-day mortality rate, tracheostomy among COVID-19 patients is a safe and an effective weaning tool.

7.
Qatar Med J ; 2022(3): 28, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1911980

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can present with various neuropsychiatric manifestations. This study reports on patients with COVID-19 who were referred to the consultation-liaison (CL) psychiatry services in Qatar and compares the clinical and sociodemographic characteristics of those diagnosed with delirium versus other psychiatric diagnoses. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the first 100 consecutive patients with COVID-19 who were referred to the CL services. RESULTS: Within the total cohort (n=100), most patients (92%) were male, and the mean age was 46 years. About 27% of patients had asymptomatic COVID-19, 35% had a past psychiatric history, and 48% reported pandemic related psychosocial stress. Delirium was the most common psychiatric diagnosis (n=29), followed by acute stress reaction/adjustment disorder, depression, mania, anxiety, non-affective psychosis, and dementia. Among patients with delirium, agitation was the most common symptom (76%), 86% were treated with psychotropic medications, and 17% died. Higher age, longer hospital stays, lower oxygen saturation, lower lymphocytic count, and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) values were significantly associated with delirium versus other psychiatric diagnoses. Higher age and lower oxygen saturations predicted delirium. CONCLUSION: Delirium was associated with a range of clinical variables and had significant mortality, despite the relatively young age of the patients. COVID-19 should be considered in patients presenting with delirium. Finally, early identification and management of delirium should be integral to COVID-19 protocols.

9.
International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies ; 17(6):1-19, 2022.
Article in English | APA PsycInfo | ID: covidwho-1824453

ABSTRACT

As the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) spread rapidly across the globe, most educational institutions tried to address major challenges of engaging students in a productive way and disseminating knowledge through online learning. Given this consideration, the present study qualitatively explores the observations and experiences of a private university and giant strides taken by the institution in adapting and delivering value to all the stakeholders through educational transformation during the pandemic. The data was collected using observations and in-depth interviews. The findings of the study revealed that the university went through certain structural changes and modified teaching pedagogy for virtual delivery like providing support and training to the faculty before shifting completely to online mode and delivering the sessions online in both synchronous and asynchronous mode. The results of the study are likely to help transform and address the major challenges of engaging students in a productive way and disseminating knowledge through online learning during a pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)

10.
Processes ; 10(5):838, 2022.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-1810092

ABSTRACT

Generally, software developers make errors during the distributed software development process;therefore, software testing delay is a significant concern. Some of the software mistakes are minor, but others may be costly or harmful. Since things can still go wrong-individuals encounter mistakes from time to time-there is a need to double-check any software we develop in a distributed environment. The current global pandemic, COVID-19, has exacerbated and generated new challenges for IT organizations. Many issues exist for distributed software testing that prevent the achievement of successful and timely risk reduction when several of the mechanisms on which testing is based are disrupted. The environment surrounding COVID-19 is quickly evolving on a daily basis. Moreover, the pandemic has exposed or helped to develop flaws in production systems, which obstruct software test completion. Although some of these issues were urgent and needed to be evaluated early during the distributed software development process, this paper attempts to capture the details that represent the current pandemic reality in the software testing process. We used a Fuzzy TOPSIS-based multiple-criteria decision-making approach to evaluate the distributed software testing challenges. The statistical findings show that data insecurity is the biggest challenge for successful distributed software testing.

11.
J Family Med Prim Care ; 11(2): 751-757, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1776490

ABSTRACT

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has emerged as the most challenging global health problem of this century. The concomitant presence of co-morbidities like chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, CHD, further complicates the problem. Aim: To assess the patterns of LFT abnormalities in patients of SARS-CoV-2 infection with and without CKD and evaluate the probable outcomes. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional retrospective observational study done on 600 patient samples (Group 1: SARS-CoV-2 without CKD, Group 2: SARS-CoV-2 with CKD and Group 3: CKD uninfected with SARS-CoV-2) which were processed for LFT and KFT. Results: AST and ALT were significantly higher in all SARS-CoV-2 infected; Group 1 mean ± 2SD, (63.63 ± 42.89U/L & 50.25 ± 46.53U/L), group 2 (90.59 ± 62.51U/L & 72.09 ± 67.24 U/L) as compared to Group 3 (25.24 ± 7.47U/L & 24.93 ± 11.44U/L). A statistically significant elevation is seen in these two parameters in Group 2 as compared to Group 1. There was a negative significant correlation between eGFR and AST/ALT levels in Group 1 (p < 0.05). In Group 2, a weak positive correlation was seen with ALT. Group 3, eGFR's showed strong correlations with AST and ALT levels; reduction in kidney function correlated well with increase in serum ALP levels. Conclusions: This study establishes that SARS-CoV-2 infected, with CKD, show higher elevations in serum aminotransferase levels in comparison to those without CKD. In contrast, the CKD group not infected, shows a decline in serum aminotransferase levels. Serum ALT values in SARS-CoV-2 show significant correlation with eGFR. Also, elevated ALP values in CKD patients may be used as an indicator of declining kidney function.

12.
COVID ; 2(4):433-449, 2022.
Article in English | MDPI | ID: covidwho-1762675

ABSTRACT

Gut microflora dysbiosis affects the majority of individuals after COVID-19, contributing to both gastro-intestinal (GI) and non-GI symptoms. Natural phytochemicals have reported anti-viral properties and favourable effects on inflammatory and oxidative pathways, both important for tissue damage post-viral pneumonia. This study involved 147 participants with symptomatic COVID-19, randomised to receive a placebo (P) or a phytochemical-rich concentrated food capsule (PC) in addition to a pre/probiotic lactobacillus capsule. Participants taking the PC had an almost two-fold reduction in mean fatigue scores compared to P [p = 0.02], a three-fold reduction in cough score and more than a double improvement in overall well-being scores [p = 0.02]. Two (1.5%) participants reported mild, increased bloating which they felt was attributable to the capsules, although GI symptoms improved in 25 of 31 participants (82%) who reported them at baseline. Sedentary, older, previously hospitalised men with GI symptoms had a statistically significantly improvement among those given the probiotic. Although some participants with early disease would have improved spontaneously, such a rapid improvement observed in the majority of participants, who had been suffering for an average of 108 days, was clinically relevant and welcomed, especially among those more likely to have pre-existing gut dysbiosis. We are now evaluating whether this blend could also enhance antibody titres post-COVID-19 vaccination.

13.
BJPsych open ; 7(Suppl 1):S257-S258, 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1661160

ABSTRACT

Aims Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with higher rates of psychiatric morbidity due to various factors, including quarantine, social isolation, stigma, financial difficulties and direct and indirect central nervous system impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2). This study aimed to describe the psychiatric morbidity of patients with COVID-19 referred to liaison psychiatry services in Qatar. Method This study was a retrospective review of patient records of the first 100 consecutive SARS-Cov-2 positive patients referred to liaison psychiatry services. The study was approved by the Hamad Medical Corporation Institutional Review Board (IRB) (MRC-05–072). Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Result The majority (n = 92) of 100 included patients were male and median age was 43 years. Patients were of diverse background with majority of South Asian (Indian, Pakistani, Bengali, Nepalese, and Afghan) (n = 60), followed by Qatari (n = 18) background. Mean length of hospital stay was 26.51 days. 35 patients had severe or critical COVID-19 pneumonia, and 67 had at least one underlying physical comorbidity. Significant psychosocial stressors other than positive SARS-Cov-2 status, including lockdown, quarantine, finances and relationships issues were identified in 48 patients. A total of 35 patients had a positive past psychiatric history, out of which 17 were on maintenance psychotropic medications. Insomnia was the commonest psychiatric symptom (n = 65), followed by anxiety (n = 52), agitation (n = 42), depression (n = 39), changes in appetite (n = 32) and irritability (n = 30). The principal psychiatric diagnoses made were delirium (n = 29), acute stress reaction or adjustment disorder (n = 25), depression (n = 16), mania (n = 15), anxiety (n = 14), non-affective psychosis (n = 13), and dementia (n = 6). Approximately half of the patients with mania or non-affective psychosis had it as their first-onset disorder. Conclusion SARS-CoV-2, in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients, is associated with a wide range of psychiatric morbidity which emphasizes clinicians’ vigilance for psychiatric symptoms. Insomnia was the commonest neuropsychiatric symptom which may have clinical practice and potential preventive strategies implications. Delirium, the commonest diagnosis in the study carries high morbidity and mortality and may reflect SARS-Cov-2 propensity to affect the brain directly and indirectly through a cytokine storm, organ failure, and prothrombotic state. Patients can also present with new-onset mania or non-affective psychosis. It is noteworthy that about two-thirds of the patients had no past psychiatric history. This study, along with expanding body of evidence may assist with resource allocation and liaison psychiatry services planning. It also underscores the importance of designing future studies to better understand longer-term psychiatric sequelae of COVID-19.

14.
J Am Med Dir Assoc ; 23(2): 241-246, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1587370

ABSTRACT

Decades of concerns about the quality of care provided by nursing homes have led state and federal agencies to create layers of regulations and penalties. As such, regulatory efforts to improve nursing home care have largely focused on the identification of deficiencies and assignment of sanctions. The current regulatory strategy often places nursing home teams and government agencies at odds, hindering their ability to build a culture of safety in nursing homes that is foundational to health care quality. Imbuing safety culture into nursing homes will require nursing homes and regulatory agencies to acknowledge the high-risk nature of post-acute and long-term care settings, embrace just culture, and engage nursing home staff and stakeholders in actions that are supported by evidence-based best practices. The response to the COVID-19 pandemic prompted some of these actions, leading to changes in nursing survey and certification processes as well as deployment of strike teams to support nursing homes in crisis. These actions, coupled with investments in public health that include funds earmarked for nursing homes, could become the initial phases of an intentional renovation of the existing regulatory oversight from one that is largely punitive to one that is rooted in safety culture and proactively designed to achieve meaningful and sustained improvements in the quality of care and life for nursing home residents.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Nursing Homes , SARS-CoV-2 , Safety Management
15.
Qatar Med J ; 2021(3): 65, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1566764

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A range of neuropsychiatric diagnoses have been reported in association with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, only sporadic cases of mania or hypomania have been reported in patients with COVID-19. This study aimed to report clinical characteristics of 15 consecutive cases of COVID-19-associated mania or hypomania seen in three general hospitals in Qatar in the early months of the pandemic in 2020. METHODS: This study is a retrospective case-note review of 15 cases of COVID-19-associated mania or hypomania (confirmed by polymerase chain reaction test), seen as inpatient consultations out of the first 100 consecutive patients managed by consultation-liaison psychiatric teams in Qatar between 2 March 2020 and 7 July 2020. RESULTS: The mean age of the 15 patients was 40 years. Twelve patients had mania, and three had hypomania. Regarding the physical severity of COVID-19, 10 patients were asymptomatic, two had upper respiratory tract symptoms alone and three had pneumonia. None of the patients were intubated. Potential risk factors for mania/hypomania included pandemic-related psychosocial stress before admission (n = 9), past history of mania/bipolar disorder (n = 6) or psychosis (n = 2), raised inflammatory markers (n = 7) and steroid use (n = 3). None had a history of recent substance misuse. Other than one patient with advanced cancer, none had comorbidity regarded as likely to have caused mania or hypomania. Three patients had mild white matter ischaemic changes on brain imaging. Standard pharmacological treatment for mania (i.e. antipsychotic medication supplemented by prn benzodiazepines) was effective. Ten patients were discharged home from the COVID-19 facility where they presented, but five required transfer to Qatar's psychiatric hospital for further treatment of mania. CONCLUSION: The association of mania or hypomania with COVID-19 may be spurious (e.g. representing an initial presentation of bipolar disorder) or causal. The reported cases illustrate a range of potential aetiological mechanisms by which COVID-19 could cause mania or hypomania. Cohort studies are necessary to determine the incidence, aetiology and prognosis of COVID-19-associated mania/hypomania.

16.
Indian J Urol ; 37(4): 331-334, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1450897

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in various body fluids. Its presence in semen has been tested with contradictory results. This study aimed to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 virus using the real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) in semen and seminal plasma from men with active COVID-19 infection. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study at a COVID facility, men aged 20-45 years with active COVID-19 infection provided semen samples within 7 days of symptom onset or 5 days of nasopharyngeal rRT-PCR test positivity in asymptomatic men. Testing of SARS-CoV-2 was performed using rRT-PCR and semen analysis was done for sperm counts and motility as per the WHO (2010) standards. RESULTS: A total of 37 men with a mean age of 32.2 ± 5.6 years were tested. SARS CoV-2 virus could not be isolated in any of the samples. Further, microscopic analysis done on 17 samples showed normal semen parameters during the active phase of disease. CONCLUSION: Men with mild COVID-19 disease or asymptomatic individuals do not shed virus in their semen, ruling out sexual contact as a mode of transmission in this subset of population.

17.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(9)2021 Sep 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1416638

ABSTRACT

Mucormycosis is a very commonly encountered disease in the sinonasal region in patients with diabetes and immunocompromised status specially in the northern part of the Indian continent. Due to its fulminant nature and involvement in the rhino-orbital-cerebral region, prognosis is poor even after extensive debridement and amphotericin-B therapy. We present a case with diagnosis of sarcoidosis being treated with systemic steroids who developed sudden-onset ptosis and left lateral rectus palsy. On radiological evaluation with MRI, a heterogenously peripherally enhancing lesion was seen in the nasopharynx suggestive of nasopharyngeal abscess. The patient was taken up for emergency surgery; a necrotic lesion with destruction of sphenoid bone, pterygoids and clivus was seen originating in the nasopharynx. The lesion on fungal staining came out to be broad aseptate hyphae suggestive of mucormycosis.


Subject(s)
Mucorales , Mucormycosis , Osteomyelitis , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Debridement , Humans , Mucormycosis/diagnosis , Mucormycosis/drug therapy , Osteomyelitis/diagnostic imaging , Osteomyelitis/drug therapy , Skull Base/diagnostic imaging
18.
Indian J Surg Oncol ; 12(Suppl 2): 279-289, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1409406

ABSTRACT

Head and neck pathologies requiring surgical intervention are considered a high-risk subsite in the context of COVID-19 pandemic by virtue of its close proximity to the mucosa of the upper aerodigestive tract. Retrospective review of all head and neck surgical procedures is undertaken during the pandemic from 23rd April 2020 to 30th September 2020. One hundred procedures were performed on 98 patients. COVID-19 status determined by SARS-Cov-2 RT-PCR at baseline was negative for 81, positive in 8 and unknown in 11. The RT-PCR negative subgroup included 40 diagnostic procedures and 41 ablative and or reconstructive procedures for head and neck neoplasms. None of the patients or health-care workers converted to COVID-19-positive status during the duration of the hospital stay. There were no cases with 30-day mortality. Clavien-Dindo grading for postoperative complications was as follows: 1-4, 2-12, 3a-2, 3b-1. Eleven patients with unknown COVID-19 status at baseline underwent emergency tracheostomy in a COVID-19 designated operating room for upper airway obstruction secondary to head and neck cancer. Of the 8 procedures conducted on known cases of COVID-19, 6 were tracheostomies performed for COVID-19 ARDS. The rest were maxillectomy for acute invasive mucormycosis and incision and drainage for parotid abscess. A matched-pair analysis was performed with similarly staged historical cohort operated during January to December 2016 to compare peri-operative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo Score). Incidence of complication with higher Clavien Dindo Score (>/=3a) was found to be lower in those patients operated during the pandemic (p=0.007). By meticulous preoperative COVID-19 screening and isolation, head and neck surgical procedures can be continued to avoid delay in diagnosis and treatment without jeopardising the risk of transmission of COVID-19 to the patients or health-care workers.

19.
Front Public Health ; 9: 727748, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1405443

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Healthcare workers are the critical frontline workforce of the COVD-19 pandemic and are considered a target group for vaccination. Hesitancy to vaccinate is a major concern that can jeopardize the vaccination programme. The hesitancy rates in the general population and healthcare workers (HCWs) vary globally, and more importantly, hesitancy in HCWs is of particular concern, as it can influence the wider population. Materials and Methods: The present study evaluated the vaccine hesitancy rate and its sociodemographic and attitudinal factors among the HCWs in the state of Qatar. We conducted a national cross-sectional survey using a validated hesitancy measurement tool between October 15 and November 15, 2020. A total of 7,821 adults above the age of 18 years out of the 2.3 million adult Qatari residents completed the survey. While majority of the participants were from the general public, 1,546 participants were HCWs. Sociodemographic data, along with attitudes and beliefs around COVID-19 vaccination, were collected from the respondents. Results: We found that 12.9% of the study participants showed vaccine hesitancy, defined as definitely or probably will not take the vaccine if offered, and 25.31% reported that they were unsure about the uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine. Female respondents were more hesitant toward the vaccine. Safety and efficacy concerns of vaccine were the significant predictors of vaccine hesitancy. The primary predictor for vaccine acceptance was a better understanding of the disease and vaccine. Discussion: Overall, 1 in 8 HCWs were reluctant to get vaccinated against COVID-19, mainly due to concerns about the vaccine's efficacy and safety. Education about the vaccine's safety and efficacy can potentially improve acceptance among healthcare workers.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Adolescent , Adult , Attitude , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Qatar , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Energy ; : 121932, 2021.
Article in English | ScienceDirect | ID: covidwho-1385537

ABSTRACT

A significant increase in carbon footprint and energy requirements over the decades raised concerns among governments and policymakers. One of the primary contributors to this menace is the automotive sector, which heavily relied on gasoline vehicles. Electric vehicles (EVs) seem to be one of the promising steps towards reducing the carbon footprint and make the transportation sector energy efficient. However, a good forecast of EV demand and the development of related resources are significant challenges for policymakers worldwide. We use various diffusion models, specifically Gompertz, Logistic, Bass, and Generalized Bass, to simulate future EV demand, and in the process, discover multiple insights. We predicted the EV sales of 20 major countries and identified the clusters with the best-fit model for each country based on the accuracy metrics, namely, mean absolute percentage error and mean absolute deviation. A comparative analysis across four different forecasting models provides a new direction to envisage energy requirements. The modeling of external variables like charging infrastructure with the Generalized Bass diffusion model further improves the utility of this study. Sensitivity analysis of the models further reveals different diffusion scenarios and possible policy measures to improve EV acceptances, especially in the presence of an uncertain environment like COVID-19.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL